State v. Shoemaker
This text of 196 P. 1066 (State v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was charged, tried and convicted of the crime of syndicalism. From the judgment entered after the verdict, the appeal is prosecuted.
All the questions presented in this case are covered by the cases of State v. Hennessy, 114 Wash. 361, 195 Pac. 211; State v. Hestings, ante p. 19, 196 Pac. 13, and State v. Hemhelter, ante p. 208, 196 Pac. 581. Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment will be affirmed.
Parker, C. J., Mitchell, Tolman, and Mount, J J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 P. 1066, 115 Wash. 693, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoemaker-wash-1921.