State v. Shoemaker

175 S.E.2d 781, 9 N.C. App. 273, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1338
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 5, 1970
DocketNo. 7022SC384
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 S.E.2d 781 (State v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shoemaker, 175 S.E.2d 781, 9 N.C. App. 273, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1338 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Morris, J.

The order granting the extension of time to serve the case on appeal was not signed by the trial judge who signed the order which is the basis of this appeal as required by Rules 5 and 50 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. The appeal is, therefore, subject to dismissal.

We have nevertheless examined defendant’s assignments of error and are of the opinion that they are without merit.

Appeal dismissed.

Brock and Graham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brady
192 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Keyes v. Hardin Oil Co.
186 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 S.E.2d 781, 9 N.C. App. 273, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoemaker-ncctapp-1970.