State v. Shoemaker
175 S.E.2d 781, 9 N.C. App. 273, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1338
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided August 5, 1970·No. No. 7022SC384·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The order granting the extension of time to serve the case on appeal was not signed by the trial judge who signed the order which is the basis of this appeal as required by Rules 5 and 50 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. The appeal is, therefore, subject to dismissal.
We have nevertheless examined defendant’s assignments of error and are of the opinion that they are without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Shoemaker, 175 S.E.2d 781, 9 N.C. App. 273, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1338 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).
175 S.E.2d 781 (State v. Shoemaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Brady
192 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Keyes v. Hardin Oil Co.
186 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)