State v. . Shoemaker

161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 844, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 147
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 23, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 925 (State v. . Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Shoemaker, 161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 844, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 147 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Pek Cukiam.

Defendants’ assignments of error on this appeal cannot be sustained. There was evidence tending to show that defendants are guilty as the State contended, at the trial. This evidence was submitted to the jury under a charge which is free from error. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 844, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoemaker-nc-1931.