State v. Shoemaker

219 S.W.3d 281, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2007 WL 1052664
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 2007
DocketED 88405
StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 281 (State v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shoemaker, 219 S.W.3d 281, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2007 WL 1052664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kevin Shoemaker, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of section 195.246 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Merrick
219 S.W.3d 281 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W.3d 281, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2007 WL 1052664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoemaker-moctapp-2007.