State v. Shoemaker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shoemaker

219 S.W.3d 281, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2007 WL 1052664

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2007·No. ED 88405·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kevin Shoemaker, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of section 195.246 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kevin Shoemaker, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of section 195.246 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shoemaker, 219 S.W.3d 281, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2007 WL 1052664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

219 S.W.3d 281 (State v. Shoemaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related