State v. Shobe

290 S.W.3d 161, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1142, 2009 WL 2432343
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 11, 2009·No. ED 91790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl D. Shobe, Jr. (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction of burglary in the second degree. Defendant claims the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial after the state elicited evidence of other crimes.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Shobe, 290 S.W.3d 161, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1142, 2009 WL 2432343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

290 S.W.3d 161 (State v. Shobe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hudson
290 S.W.3d 161 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)