State v. . Shoaf

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Shoaf

184 S.E. 485, 209 N.C. 851, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 384

DecidedMarch 18, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 184 S.E. 485 (State v. . Shoaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Shoaf, 184 S.E. 485, 209 N.C. 851, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 384 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record is not altogether free from difficulty. The evidence tending to impeach the prosecuting witness’ identity of the defendants as his assailants was competent, but its exclusion will not be held for reversible error, as the impeachment was otherwise before the jury without objection.

The question of jurisdiction, raised by the defendants, was decided against them in S. v. Everhardt, 203 N. C., 610, 166 S. E., 738.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record is not altogether free from difficulty. The evidence tending to impeach the prosecuting witness’ identity of the defendants as his assailants was competent, but its exclusion will not be held for reversible error, as the impeachment was otherwise before the jury without objection.

The question of jurisdiction, raised by the defendants, was decided against them in S. v. Everhardt, 203 N. C., 610, 166 S. E., 738.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E. 485, 209 N.C. 851, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoaf-nc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack