State v. . Shoaf
184 S.E. 485, 209 N.C. 851, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 384
Opinion
The record is not altogether free from difficulty. The evidence tending to impeach the prosecuting witness’ identity of the defendants as his assailants was competent, but its exclusion will not be held for reversible error, as the impeachment was otherwise before the jury without objection.
The question of jurisdiction, raised by the defendants, was decided against them in S. v. Everhardt, 203 N. C., 610, 166 S. E., 738.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Shoaf, 184 S.E. 485, 209 N.C. 851, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 384 (N.C. 1936).
184 S.E. 485 (State v. . Shoaf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Everhardt
166 S.E. 738 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)