State v. Shklyayev
This text of 100 P.3d 789 (State v. Shklyayev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was committed to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on the trial court’s finding that, because of a mental disorder, appellant is dangerous to herself. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). She appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that the state had proved by clear and convincing evidence that she is dangerous to herself. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to establish the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. After reviewing the record, we accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 P.3d 789, 196 Or. App. 238, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shklyayev-orctapp-2004.