State v. Shillingford
766 So. 2d 1044, 2000 WL 1158347
This text of 766 So. 2d 1044 (State v. Shillingford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Shillingford, 766 So. 2d 1044, 2000 WL 1158347 (Fla. 2000).
Opinion
We initially accepted review of the opinion in State v. Shillingford, 731 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in State v. Gitto, 731 So.2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Gitto
731 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
State v. Shillingford
731 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 1044, 2000 WL 1158347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shillingford-fla-2000.