State v. Shilling

10 Iowa 106
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 6, 1859·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wright, C. J.

This conviction was clearly irregular and unwarranted. The right of the State to again indict or file a second information for the offenses specified in the first and second counts, is not denied after entering a nolle prosequi as to them. But there is no principal justifying the trial of the defendant upon these counts after their withdrawal in the same proceeding, or on the same information. For this proceeding these counts ceased to have any vitality, [107]*107any legal existence, and to try tbe defendant upon them, was to try him as it were without an indictment or information.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Shilling, 10 Iowa 106 (iowa 1859).

10 Iowa 106 (State v. Shilling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 1856
274 N.W. 916 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1937)
Commonwealth v. McClusky
25 N.E. 72 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Woodworth v. Mills
20 N.W. 728 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)