State v. Shiller
This text of 214 N.W.2d 616 (State v. Shiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, James Stanley Shiller, was convicted of robbery and sentenced to a term of 9 to 20 years imprisonment.
The defendant was tried jointly with two other codefendants. The facts of the robbery are fully set out in *292 State v. Huerta, ante p. 280, 214 N. W. 2d 613. That case is determinative of all issues in this case except for the assignment of error dealing with the consolidation of the defendant’s trial with that of two other joint defendants.
The defendant here contends that the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate the cases of the three defendants for trial. Cases may be consolidated for trial if the offenses charged are based on the same act or transaction. § 29-2002, R. R. S. 1943.
The defendants were represented by separate counsel. Virtually all the evidence was admissible against all the defendants. There was no showing of any substantial prejudice to any defendant as a result of the consolidation. A ruling on a motion for consolidation will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. State v. Shimp, 190 Neb. 137, 206 N. W. 2d 627.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 N.W.2d 616, 191 Neb. 291, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shiller-neb-1974.