State v. Shields

359 Mont. 66
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 5, 2010
DocketCAUSE NO. DC-07-175
StatusPublished

This text of 359 Mont. 66 (State v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shields, 359 Mont. 66 (Mo. 2010).

Opinion

[67]*67On April 1, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to four (4) years in the Montana State Prison, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Driving a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs, Fourth or Subsequent Offense, a felony.

On August 5, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 Mont. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shields-mont-2010.