State v. Sherwood
This text of 41 La. Ann. 316 (State v. Sherwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The accused was indicted, and convicted of forgery. He has appealed. His defense is “that the order charged to be forged is not copied into the indictment.”
The instrument forged is described in the indictment by the name by which it is usually known, and the designation is in conformity to the provisions of Section 1049 R. S.
It was not necessary to set out any copy or foe simile of the order forged in the indictment.
It is therefore ordered that the sentence and judgment appealed from be affirmed at appellant’s cost,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 La. Ann. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sherwood-la-1889.