State v. Sherman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Sherman

185 S.E.2d 22, 13 N.C. App. 222, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1202

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 15, 1971

DocketNo. 714SC649

StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E.2d 22 (State v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sherman, 185 S.E.2d 22, 13 N.C. App. 222, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1202 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

In his brief defense counsel candidly states that he is unable to discover any error of law in the trial or sentence. The record contains no exceptions and no assignments of error so the judgment must be sustained unless error appears on the face of the record. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781 (1967) ; State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447 (1966). We have carefully reviewed the entire record and find

No error.

Judges Campbell and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

In his brief defense counsel candidly states that he is unable to discover any error of law in the trial or sentence. The record contains no exceptions and no assignments of error so the judgment must be sustained unless error appears on the face of the record. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781 (1967) ; State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447 (1966). We have carefully reviewed the entire record and find

No error.

Judges Campbell and Parker concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E.2d 22, 13 N.C. App. 222, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sherman-ncctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack