State v. Sherman
185 S.E.2d 22, 13 N.C. App. 222, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1202
Opinion
In his brief defense counsel candidly states that he is unable to discover any error of law in the trial or sentence. The record contains no exceptions and no assignments of error so the judgment must be sustained unless error appears on the face of the record. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781 (1967) ; State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447 (1966). We have carefully reviewed the entire record and find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sherman, 185 S.E.2d 22, 13 N.C. App. 222, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1202 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).
185 S.E.2d 22 (State v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Higgs
153 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
State v. Williams
150 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)