State v. Sherman

662 S.E.2d 389, 362 N.C. 350, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 448
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Sherman. Read the opinion of the Court — 662 S.E.2d 388
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 10, 2008·No. 313PA07·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari filed by the State in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Durham County:

“Rule 24 authorizes the trial court to consider ‘the existence of evidence of aggravating circumstances,’ Gen. R. Pract. Super. & Dist. Cts. 24, 2008 Ann. R. N.C. 25, but ‘does not permit a trial court to declare a case noncapital based on the State’s forecast of evidence of guilt of the underlying first-degree murder charge.’ State v. Seward, 362 N.C. 210, 216 (2008). The trial court therefore exceeded the scope of a Rule 24 conference when it declared defendant’s case noncapital on the basis of its consideration of evidence relating to the underlying charge of first-degree murder. Id. Accordingly, the State’s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of reversing the trial court’s order and remanding for a new Rule 24 conference to be held consistent with Rule 24 and this Court’s decision in Seward, 362 N.C. 210,-S.E.2d-.”

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April, 2008.

Edmunds, J. For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sherman, 662 S.E.2d 389, 362 N.C. 350, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 448 (N.C. 2008).

662 S.E.2d 389 (State v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Seward
657 S.E.2d 356 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)