State v. Sherman
This text of 50 Mo. 265 (State v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendant was indicted and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors as a dram-shop keeper without a license from the County Court. The place of sale was in the town of Clinton, Henry county, and the defendant set up as a bar to the indictment a license which had been issued to him by the town authorities. There is nothing in the charter of the town which excludes the right of the County Court to demand license. In such case the defendant is not protected by the town license, but must also take out a license from the County Court. This is the-settled law of this State. (See Harrison v. The State, 9 Mo. 526; Austin v. The State, 10 Mo. 595.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 Mo. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sherman-mo-1872.