State v. Sherburne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Sherburne

58 N.H. 159

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedAugust 5, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 159 (State v. Sherburne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sherburne, 58 N.H. 159 (N.H. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Foster, J.

The indictment is not sufficient, upon s. 5, 6, or 7, c. 259, Gen. St., because it does not allege that the officer was engaged in tlie service of process in a civil case, or in any criminal case described in either of those sections. It is not sufficient, upon s. 8, because it does not allege that the officer was in the discharge of any duty of his office “ in any case not included in the preceding sections.”

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster, J.

The indictment is not sufficient, upon s. 5, 6, or 7, c. 259, Gen. St., because it does not allege that the officer was engaged in tlie service of process in a civil case, or in any criminal case described in either of those sections. It is not sufficient, upon s. 8, because it does not allege that the officer was in the discharge of any duty of his office “ in any case not included in the preceding sections.”

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sherburne-nh-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack