State v. Sherburne

58 N.H. 159
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Foster, J.

The indictment is not sufficient, upon s. 5, 6, or 7, c. 259, Gen. St., because it does not allege that the officer was engaged in tlie service of process in a civil case, or in any criminal case described in either of those sections. It is not sufficient, upon s. 8, because it does not allege that the officer was in the discharge of any duty of his office “ in any case not included in the preceding sections.”

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sherburne, 58 N.H. 159 (N.H. 1877).

58 N.H. 159 (State v. Sherburne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Langdon
64 A. 1099 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)
State v. Leavitt
63 N.H. 381 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1885)