State v. Sheppard

37 Wis. 395
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

LyON, J.

This case comes here on the report of the judge of the sixth circuit, submitting certain questions of law to this court for determination. It appears from the report that the defendant was tried and convicted on a criminal information against him, and that judgment was duly pronounced and entered upon such conviction.

Doubtful questions of law arising on the trial of a criminal case may be reported to this court for determination. R. S., [396]*396ch. 180, sec. 8. But the report must be made before judgment. After judgment, a writ of error must be resorted to, in order to have the case reviewed by this court. It is very clear that the legislature did not intend that the report which is authorized should ever perform the office of a writ of error. The provisions of secs. 8, 9 and 10 of the above chapter all show a contrary intention.

We have no authority to determine the questions which the learned circuit judge has attempted to submit to us, and can take no action on the report, nor make any order thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sheppard, 37 Wis. 395 (Wis. 1875).

37 Wis. 395 (State v. Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Surdick
197 N.W. 186 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1924)
People v. Dickerson
127 N.W. 38 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Marinan v. Baker
12 N.M. 451 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1904)
Gonzales y Borrego v. Territory of New Mexico
8 N.M. 446 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1896)