State v. Shepherd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shepherd

380 S.W.3d 615, 2012 WL 4086532, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97897·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Shepherd (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of second-degree assault and-armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Shepherd (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of second-degree assault and-armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shepherd, 380 S.W.3d 615, 2012 WL 4086532, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 615 (State v. Shepherd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.