State v. Shepard
This text of 227 N.E.2d 216 (State v. Shepard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the instant case, appellant, an indigent convicted defendant, was denied counsel on his appeal as of right.
Under the doctrine enunciated in State v. Catlino, 10 Ohio St. 2d 183, and Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, a convicted indigent defendant has a constitutional right to court-appointed counsel at state expense on his appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals.
The trial court, having determined that appellant was an indigent, erred in denying his request that it appoint counsel for him for his appeal as of right.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the appointment of counsel for appellant’s appeal from the denial of his motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.E.2d 216, 10 Ohio St. 2d 264, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 413, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shepard-ohio-1967.