State v. Shepard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shepard

367 S.W.3d 673, 2012 WL 2107271, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 786

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 96715·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Todd Shepard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support Shepard’s first-degree murder conviction, and therefore the trial court did not err in denying Shepard’s motions for judgment of acquittal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Todd Shepard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support Shepard’s first-degree murder conviction, and therefore the trial court did not err in denying Shepard’s motions for judgment of acquittal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shepard, 367 S.W.3d 673, 2012 WL 2107271, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 673 (State v. Shepard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.