State v. . Shemwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Shemwell

65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 694, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 346

DecidedNovember 11, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 1101 (State v. . Shemwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Shemwell, 65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 694, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 346 (N.C. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cueiam :

There is only one assignment of error set out in the brief of counsel for defendant, and that is directed to one clause in the charge of the court. Upon a careful examination of the entire evidence, and of the charge as a whole, we are convinced that the case was fairly presented to the jury, without any substantial error, and that they fully understood the questions submitted for their decision.

We find no reversible error — nothing which warrants us in ordering another trial.

No error.

WaleeR, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam :

There is only one assignment of error set out in the brief of counsel for defendant, and that is directed to one clause in the charge of the court. Upon a careful examination of the entire evidence, and of the charge as a whole, we are convinced that the case was fairly presented to the jury, without any substantial error, and that they fully understood the questions submitted for their decision.

We find no reversible error — nothing which warrants us in ordering another trial.

No error.

WaleeR, J., dissenting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 694, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shemwell-nc-1909.