State v. Shelton
647 P.2d 990, 58 Or. App. 214, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558
Opinion
Defendant appeals pro se after conviction on the charge of violating ORS 618.121 by operating a scale without a license.
Defendant makes three assignments of error; however, due to defendant’s failure to quote verbatim the pertinent portions of the record under the assignments of error as required by ORAP 7.19, we will not consider them. State v. Mendenhall, 53 Or App 174, 631 P2d 791 (1981); State v. Addicks, 34 Or App 557, 579 P2d 289, rev den 284 Or 80-a (1978).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Shelton, 647 P.2d 990, 58 Or. App. 214, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
647 P.2d 990 (State v. Shelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Addicks
579 P.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Mendenhall
631 P.2d 791 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)