State v. Shelton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Shelton

647 P.2d 990, 58 Or. App. 214, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 14, 1982

DocketNo. 81-29981, CA A23821

StatusPublished

This text of 647 P.2d 990 (State v. Shelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Shelton, 647 P.2d 990, 58 Or. App. 214, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals pro se after conviction on the charge of violating ORS 618.121 by operating a scale without a license.

Defendant makes three assignments of error; however, due to defendant’s failure to quote verbatim the pertinent portions of the record under the assignments of error as required by ORAP 7.19, we will not consider them. State v. Mendenhall, 53 Or App 174, 631 P2d 791 (1981); State v. Addicks, 34 Or App 557, 579 P2d 289, rev den 284 Or 80-a (1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals pro se after conviction on the charge of violating ORS 618.121 by operating a scale without a license.

Defendant makes three assignments of error; however, due to defendant’s failure to quote verbatim the pertinent portions of the record under the assignments of error as required by ORAP 7.19, we will not consider them. State v. Mendenhall, 53 Or App 174, 631 P2d 791 (1981); State v. Addicks, 34 Or App 557, 579 P2d 289, rev den 284 Or 80-a (1978).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 P.2d 990, 58 Or. App. 214, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shelton-orctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack