State v. Shelton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shelton

460 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2015 WL 1548870

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Shelton. Read the opinion of the Court — 529 S.W.3d 853 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 2015·No. No. ED 101540·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jordan Shelton III appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault. We find the trial court did not err in refusing to submit a defense-of-others instruction to the jury.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jordan Shelton III appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault. We find the trial court did not err in refusing to submit a defense-of-others instruction to the jury.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shelton, 460 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2015 WL 1548870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

460 S.W.3d 481 (State v. Shelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.