State v. Shelton
This text of 66 S.W.3d 125 (State v. Shelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Kenneth Shelton (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment in a jury tried case finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, two counts of armed criminal action, and one count of burglary in the first degree. Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in answering a jury question during their deliberations without defendant’s counsel present.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.W.3d 125, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2184, 2001 WL 1568429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shelton-moctapp-2001.