State v. Shelley

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Shelley

DecidedAugust 6, 2014

Docket2014-UP-312

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Shelley (State v. Shelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Shelley, (S.C. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bronson Shelley, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213520

Appeal From Colleton County Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-312 Submitted July 1, 2014 – Filed August 6, 2014

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Kinard, 373 S.C. 500, 503, 646 S.E.2d 168, 169 (Ct. App. 2007) ("An appellate court will not reverse the trial [court]'s decision regarding jury charges absent an abuse of discretion." (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Halcomb, 382 S.C. 432, 438, 676 S.E.2d 149, 152 (Ct. App. 2009) ("An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's ruling is based on an error of law."); Sheppard v. State, 357 S.C. 646, 665, 594 S.E.2d 462, 472 (2004) ("In general, the trial court is required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina."); State v. Miller, 397 S.C. 630, 635, 725 S.E.2d 724, 727 (Ct. App. 2012), cert. granted, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Nov. 20, 2013 (noting an appellate court "must consider the [trial] court's jury charge as a whole in light of the evidence and issues presented at trial" (alteration in original)); Tate v. State, 351 S.C. 418, 426, 570 S.E.2d 522, 527 (2002) ("Malice is the wrongful intent to injure another . . . .").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bronson Shelley, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213520

Appeal From Colleton County Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-312 Submitted July 1, 2014 – Filed August 6, 2014

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Kinard, 373 S.C. 500, 503, 646 S.E.2d 168, 169 (Ct. App. 2007) ("An appellate court will not reverse the trial [court]'s decision regarding jury charges absent an abuse of discretion." (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Halcomb, 382 S.C. 432, 438, 676 S.E.2d 149, 152 (Ct. App. 2009) ("An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's ruling is based on an error of law."); Sheppard v. State, 357 S.C. 646, 665, 594 S.E.2d 462, 472 (2004) ("In general, the trial court is required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina."); State v. Miller, 397 S.C. 630, 635, 725 S.E.2d 724, 727 (Ct. App. 2012), cert. granted, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Nov. 20, 2013 (noting an appellate court "must consider the [trial] court's jury charge as a whole in light of the evidence and issues presented at trial" (alteration in original)); Tate v. State, 351 S.C. 418, 426, 570 S.E.2d 522, 527 (2002) ("Malice is the wrongful intent to injure another . . . .").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Shelley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shelley-scctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack