State v. Shedaker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Shedaker

196 So. 2d 202, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1967

DocketNo. 66-156

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 202 (State v. Shedaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Shedaker, 196 So. 2d 202, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

The State seeks review of a criminal court order quashing an information. See: § 924.07(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The information charged the appellee with a felony by committing a lewd, lascivious or indecent act in the presence of a female child of less than fourteen years of age, in violation of § 800.04 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The appellee moved to quash the information, contending that the alleged acts, at most, constituted an offense as a misdemeanor under § 800.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which motion was granted.¹

The information, as drawn, charged a crime within the purview of § 800.04 Fla. [203]*203Stat, F.S.A. See: State v. Peacock, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 46. Therefore, we reverse the order. The cause and the ap-pellee are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARKDULL, Judge.

The State seeks review of a criminal court order quashing an information. See: § 924.07(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The information charged the appellee with a felony by committing a lewd, lascivious or indecent act in the presence of a female child of less than fourteen years of age, in violation of § 800.04 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The appellee moved to quash the information, contending that the alleged acts, at most, constituted an offense as a misdemeanor under § 800.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which motion was granted.¹

The information, as drawn, charged a crime within the purview of § 800.04 Fla. [203]*203Stat, F.S.A. See: State v. Peacock, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 46. Therefore, we reverse the order. The cause and the ap-pellee are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 2d 202, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shedaker-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack