State v. Sheasley

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Sheasley

80 P. 997, 71 Kan. 857, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 264

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 6, 1905

DocketNo. 14,083

StatusPublished

This text of 80 P. 997 (State v. Sheasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sheasley, 80 P. 997, 71 Kan. 857, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 264 (kan 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The principal question in this case has already been decided in the case of The State v. Durein, 70 Kan. 1, 78 Pac. 152, 80 Pac. 987. The court is not obliged to announce a rule of law that shall be a test in all cases of what constitutes maintaining or assisting in maintaining a liquor nuisance. The evidence in this case was sufficient to support the verdict, and the instructions of the court were not insufficient, incorrect, nor misleading.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The principal question in this case has already been decided in the case of The State v. Durein, 70 Kan. 1, 78 Pac. 152, 80 Pac. 987. The court is not obliged to announce a rule of law that shall be a test in all cases of what constitutes maintaining or assisting in maintaining a liquor nuisance. The evidence in this case was sufficient to support the verdict, and the instructions of the court were not insufficient, incorrect, nor misleading.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 P. 997, 71 Kan. 857, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sheasley-kan-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack