State v. Shay
This text of 206 N.W.2d 330 (State v. Shay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has been convicted of breaking and entering. His only assignment of error is that his sentence of 15 months to 2 years is excessive. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Defendant was charged with two counts of burglary. Due to a plea bargain, one was dismissed. He had previously been an inmate of the Boy’s Training School in 1968 and was subsequently, in 1971, convicted of breaking and entering for which he received a 1 to 3-year sentence. He served 9 months of this sentence [141]*141and was still on parole when the present offense was committed.
Although defendant was only 19 years of age, it would appear, in view of his previous record, that he was dealt with in a lenient manner. The court further ordered that he receive credit on the sentence imposed for time spent in custody prior to sentencing. The appeal is frivolous.
“Where the punishment of an offense created by statute is left to the discretion of the trial court within prescribed limits, the sentence imposed within those limits will not be disturbed unless there appears to be an abuse of discretion.” State v. Kelly, ante p. 41, 205 N. W. 2d 646.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 N.W.2d 330, 190 Neb. 140, 1973 Neb. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shay-neb-1973.