State v. Shaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shaw

539 S.W.3d 89

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Shaw. Read the opinion of the Court — 541 S.W.3d 681 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2018·No. WD 80321·Published

Opinion

Per curiam:

*90Damien Shaw ("Shaw") appeals his conviction for armed criminal action, section 571.015, in conjunction with his conviction for attempted robbery in the first-degree, section 569.020. His sole point on appeal alleges that armed criminal action cannot be predicated on an attempt offense. We affirm. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

*90Damien Shaw ("Shaw") appeals his conviction for armed criminal action, section 571.015, in conjunction with his conviction for attempted robbery in the first-degree, section 569.020. His sole point on appeal alleges that armed criminal action cannot be predicated on an attempt offense. We affirm. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shaw, 539 S.W.3d 89 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

539 S.W.3d 89 (State v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.