State v. Shaw
140 So. 3d 1163, 2014 WL 2815823, 2014 La. LEXIS 1388
Opinions
|, Granted. The court of appeal erred in ordering respondent sentenced under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and the district court’s order denying respondent’s Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence is hereby reinstated. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Shaw, 140 So. 3d 1163, 2014 WL 2815823, 2014 La. LEXIS 1388 (La. 2014).
140 So. 3d 1163 (State v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
State v. Tate
130 So. 3d 829 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2013)
Tate v. Louisiana
134 S. Ct. 2663 (Supreme Court, 2014)