State v. Shaw
This text of 140 So. 3d 1163 (State v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
|, Granted. The court of appeal erred in ordering respondent sentenced under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and the district court’s order denying respondent’s Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence is hereby reinstated. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 So. 3d 1163, 2014 WL 2815823, 2014 La. LEXIS 1388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shaw-la-2014.