State v. Shaw

693 So. 2d 582, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 943, 1997 WL 55666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1997·No. No. 96-00753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

The State appeals the circuit judge’s order, entered after trial, declaring section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1995), unconstitutional on the ground of vagueness. Based on the recent authority of State v. Barnes, [583] 686 So.2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), we reverse that ruling.

It is not necessary to remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings. The only matter appealed by the State is addressed by State v. Barnes. Although the trial court entered judgment and sentence on a lesser offense based on its ruling of uneon-stitutionality, the evidence at trial did not support a conviction for the greater offense. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences as determined and imposed by the trial judge.

Ruling on constitutionality of statute reversed; judgments and sentences affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Shaw, 693 So. 2d 582, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 943, 1997 WL 55666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 582 (State v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beree v. State
755 So. 2d 783 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)