State v. Sharpe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Sharpe

807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2061, 2002 WL 269449

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-1344

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 807 So. 2d 818 (State v. Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sharpe, 807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2061, 2002 WL 269449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rubin v. State, 390 So.2d 322 (Fla.1980)(holding that amended information may only “relate back” where the original information was timely filed); State v. Adjmi, 170 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)(holding that “[subsequent] in-formations will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun”),

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rubin v. State, 390 So.2d 322 (Fla.1980)(holding that amended information may only “relate back” where the original information was timely filed); State v. Adjmi, 170 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)(holding that “[subsequent] in-formations will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun”),

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2061, 2002 WL 269449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sharpe-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack