State v. Sharpe
807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2061, 2002 WL 269449
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. No. 4D01-1344·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Rubin v. State, 390 So.2d 322 (Fla.1980)(holding that amended information may only “relate back” where the original information was timely filed); State v. Adjmi, 170 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)(holding that “[subsequent] in-formations will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun”),
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sharpe, 807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2061, 2002 WL 269449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
807 So. 2d 818 (State v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Labrador v. State
13 So. 3d 1070 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)