State v. Sharp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sharp

473 S.W.3d 661, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2015 WL 5134923

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2015·No. ED 101879·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Sharp appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon the jury verdicts finding him guilty of two [662] counts of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Sharp appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon the jury verdicts finding him guilty of two [662] counts of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 80.25(b).

State v. Sharp, 473 S.W.3d 661, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2015 WL 5134923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

473 S.W.3d 661 (State v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.