State v. SHARKS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SHARKS

306 S.W.3d 100, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1689, 2009 WL 5449138

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. ED 91437·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Sharks, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced defendant to fifteen years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Sharks, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced defendant to fifteen years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. SHARKS, 306 S.W.3d 100, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1689, 2009 WL 5449138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

306 S.W.3d 100 (State v. SHARKS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.