State v. Shannon, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2004)
This text of 2004 Ohio 1866 (State v. Shannon, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Brian M. Shannon, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California
(1967),
{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and found one error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The trial court's sentencing order required appellant to pay court-appointed counsel fees. In State v. Cooper, Butler App. No. CA2001-03-063, 2002-Ohio-617, this court held that under R.C.
{¶ 4} Under such circumstances, Anders would seemingly dictate that we appoint new counsel to brief and argue this issue. However, we find that the total absence in the record of any determination in compliance with R.C.
{¶ 5} In all other respects, our examination of the record discloses no other errors prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court.
{¶ 6} Therefore, it is the order of this court that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and that portion of appellant's sentence ordering him to pay attorney fees is hereby reversed and the matter remanded for a determination pursuant to R.C.
Young, P.J., Powell and Valen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2004 Ohio 1866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shannon-unpublished-decision-4-12-2004-ohioctapp-2004.