State v. Shanks

40 So. 1005, 88 Miss. 410
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 So. 1005 (State v. Shanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shanks, 40 So. 1005, 88 Miss. 410 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Shanks was indicted under Code 1892, § 1219, and the indictment charged that he did “unlawfully, willfully, and profanely [412]*412curse and swear in a public place,” setting out the profane language used, “contrary to the form of'the statute in such cases made and provided,” etc. A demurrer was interposed by Shanks to the indictment on the ground that the indictment should have stated the particular public place where he did the cursing and swearing. The court sustained the demurrer, and the state appeals.

We think that the court’s action was correct. The indictment should not only have alleged that Shanks profanely cursed and swore in a public place, but it should also have stated what public place. It is not sufficient simply to state that it was done “in a public place,” without stating the particular place. In order to properly defend, it was necessary for the defendant to know in what place he vras accused of violating the law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thorne
78 S.E.2d 140 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Needham
180 So. 786 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Files v. State
50 So. 979 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 1005, 88 Miss. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shanks-miss-1906.