State v. Shambley-Bey

989 S.W.2d 681, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 535
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 27, 1999
DocketNo. 74297
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 989 S.W.2d 681 (State v. Shambley-Bey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shambley-Bey, 989 S.W.2d 681, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 535 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Andre Shambley-Bey, Movant, pleaded guilty to second degree trafficking and possession of cocaine on June 16, 1993 and the plea court suspended imposition of his sentence. Movant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d), which the court denied.

No appeal lies from the circuit court’s order denying a motion to withdraw guilty plea where the court never pronounced sentence on the plea but only suspended imposition of sentence. State v. Waters, 882 S.W.2d 269, 270-71 (Mo.App. S.D.1994). Here, the trial court appears to have suspended Movant’s probation, but the record before us fails to show Movant has ever been sentenced on these charges. Therefore, no final judgment or order supports an appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fensom
69 S.W.3d 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
989 S.W.2d 681, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shambley-bey-moctapp-1999.