State v. Shackett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Shackett

291 A.2d 757, 163 Conn. 631

DecidedJune 7, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.2d 757 (State v. Shackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Shackett, 291 A.2d 757, 163 Conn. 631 (Colo. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

The prosecuting attorney and counsel for each defendant in the above-entitled cases, tried jointly, having requested and stipulated that this court find reversible error because the record did not affirmatively disclose that the plea of guilty by each defendant was entered intelligently, understandingly and voluntarily, and in view of the decision of this court in State v. Bugbee, 161 Conn. 531, it is ordered that, in the appeal from the Appellate Session of the Circuit Court, the judgment as to each of the defendants be, and hereby is, set aside and, as to each defendant, a new trial is ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The prosecuting attorney and counsel for each defendant in the above-entitled cases, tried jointly, having requested and stipulated that this court find reversible error because the record did not affirmatively disclose that the plea of guilty by each defendant was entered intelligently, understandingly and voluntarily, and in view of the decision of this court in State v. Bugbee, 161 Conn. 531, it is ordered that, in the appeal from the Appellate Session of the Circuit Court, the judgment as to each of the defendants be, and hereby is, set aside and, as to each defendant, a new trial is ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.2d 757, 163 Conn. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shackett-conn-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack