State v. Seymour

134 P. 7, 66 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 366
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 134 P. 7 (State v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Seymour, 134 P. 7, 66 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 366 (Or. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McNary

delivered the opinion of the court.

The assignments of error upon which defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment of conviction are identical with those presented by his codefendant, Mike Spanos. The legal questions involved are the selfsame with those of State v. Mike Spanos, ante, p. 118 (134 Pac. 6), in which an opinion has just been rendered.

For the reasons indicated in that case, the judgment of conviction of this defendant is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Bean and Mr. Justice Eakin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spanos
134 P. 6 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 P. 7, 66 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-seymour-or-1913.