State v. Seymour

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Seymour

134 P. 7, 66 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 366

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided July 22, 1913·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice McNary

delivered the opinion of the court.

The assignments of error upon which defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment of conviction are identical with those presented by his codefendant, Mike Spanos. The legal questions involved are the selfsame with those of State v. Mike Spanos, ante, p. 118 (134 Pac. 6), in which an opinion has just been rendered.

For the reasons indicated in that case, the judgment of conviction of this defendant is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Bean and Mr. Justice Eakin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McNary

delivered the opinion of the court.

The assignments of error upon which defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment of conviction are identical with those presented by his codefendant, Mike Spanos. The legal questions involved are the selfsame with those of State v. Mike Spanos, ante, p. 118 (134 Pac. 6), in which an opinion has just been rendered.

For the reasons indicated in that case, the judgment of conviction of this defendant is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Bean and Mr. Justice Eakin concur.

State v. Seymour, 134 P. 7, 66 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 366 (Or. 1913).

Pincite

134 P. 7 (State v. Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related