State v. Seymour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Seymour

143 S.E.2d 69, 265 N.C. 216, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 961

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 23, 1965

Docket338

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 S.E.2d 69 (State v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Seymour, 143 S.E.2d 69, 265 N.C. 216, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 961 (N.C. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The following appears from the application for certiorari and the Attorney General’s answer: The defendant was in- *217 dieted in the Superior Court of Wayne County in eight cases, Nos. 7600 through 7607, each charging house breaking and larceny. At the November Session, 1963, the defendant (and a codefendant, Jarvis Bowen) through counsel, entered pleas of guilty to all charges. “The eight cases were consolidated for purposes of plea and judgment, the court (Cowper, J., presiding) imposed a single sentence of 20 years in the State’s Prison . . .”

The defendant, by writ of habeas corpus before Judge Mintz, challenged the legality of the sentence upon the ground that one judgment having been entered, the punishment could not exceed ten years. Judge Mintz held the sentence of 20 years was not unlawful and denied relief.

Unquestionably Judge Cowper could have entered a separate judgment in each case and could have provided that sentences run consecutively. However, he consolidated the cases and entered one judgment. That judgment could not exceed 10 years.

The cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Wayne County with directions to vacate the sentence imposed by Judge Cowper and to enter in lieu thereof a sentence which in no event may exceed the statutory limit of 10 years. The prisoner is entitled to credit thereon for the time served.

Remanded for the entry of a proper judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The following appears from the application for certiorari and the Attorney General’s answer: The defendant was in- *217 dieted in the Superior Court of Wayne County in eight cases, Nos. 7600 through 7607, each charging house breaking and larceny. At the November Session, 1963, the defendant (and a codefendant, Jarvis Bowen) through counsel, entered pleas of guilty to all charges. “The eight cases were consolidated for purposes of plea and judgment, the court (Cowper, J., presiding) imposed a single sentence of 20 years in the State’s Prison . . .”

The defendant, by writ of habeas corpus before Judge Mintz, challenged the legality of the sentence upon the ground that one judgment having been entered, the punishment could not exceed ten years. Judge Mintz held the sentence of 20 years was not unlawful and denied relief.

Unquestionably Judge Cowper could have entered a separate judgment in each case and could have provided that sentences run consecutively. However, he consolidated the cases and entered one judgment. That judgment could not exceed 10 years.

The cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Wayne County with directions to vacate the sentence imposed by Judge Cowper and to enter in lieu thereof a sentence which in no event may exceed the statutory limit of 10 years. The prisoner is entitled to credit thereon for the time served.

Remanded for the entry of a proper judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E.2d 69, 265 N.C. 216, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-seymour-nc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack