State v. Sevart

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sevart

372 S.W.3d 540, 2012 WL 1165538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 488

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2012·No. No. WD 72956·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Thomas J. Sevart, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s judgment entering convictions for statutory sodomy and furnishing pornography to a minor. He challenges the trial court’s admission of his self-incriminating statements as a violation of his constitutional rights.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Thomas J. Sevart, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s judgment entering convictions for statutory sodomy and furnishing pornography to a minor. He challenges the trial court’s admission of his self-incriminating statements as a violation of his constitutional rights.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sevart, 372 S.W.3d 540, 2012 WL 1165538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

372 S.W.3d 540 (State v. Sevart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.