State v. Sessler

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Sessler

880 N.E.2d 481, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1505

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 2008

Docket2007-2426

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 880 N.E.2d 481 (State v. Sessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sessler, 880 N.E.2d 481, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed November 30, 2007:

“Is the holding in State v. Pelfrey, 112 Ohio St.3d 422, applicable to charging statutes that contain separate sub-parts with distinct offense levels?”

O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is State v. Kepiro, Franklin App. No. 06AP-1302, 2007-Ohio-4593.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2030, State v. Sessler, Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI