State v. Session

772 P.2d 958, 96 Or. App. 363, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 492
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 3, 1989·No. C-2859; CA A48317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

EDMONDS, J.,

concurring.

I concur with the majority only because a panel of this court has held in a companion case on the same fact, that State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or App 240, 770 P2d 58, rev allowed 308 Or 158 (1989), controls. State v. Gohring, 95 Or App 746, 770 P2d 614 (1989). Were it not for that fact, I would hold that the facts of this case are distinguishable from Ainsworth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Session, 772 P.2d 958, 96 Or. App. 363, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 492 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

772 P.2d 958 (State v. Session) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gohring
803 P.2d 1189 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)