State v. Serdahely

Alaska Supreme Court

State v. Serdahely

635 P.2d 1182, 1981 Alas. LEXIS 612

Alaska Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1981·No. 6370·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1. The Original Application for Relief filed in the Court of Appeals on October 26, 1981, certified to and accepted by this court pursuant to AS 22.05.015(b) and Appellate Rule 408(b), is granted.

2. The Order of the Superior Court of October 15, 1981 entitled Denial of State’s Application to Compel Testimony of Michael DeMan and Denial of State’s Motion to Stay Hohman’s Trial, is affirmed.

3. This court adopts pursuant to its supervisory powers as a rule of practice the provisions of Rule 732 of the Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure including subsection (b) relating to the nature and scope of immunity for the reasons expressed in the commentary to the rule.

COMPTON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1. The Original Application for Relief filed in the Court of Appeals on October 26, 1981, certified to and accepted by this court pursuant to AS 22.05.015(b) and Appellate Rule 408(b), is granted.

2. The Order of the Superior Court of October 15, 1981 entitled Denial of State’s Application to Compel Testimony of Michael DeMan and Denial of State’s Motion to Stay Hohman’s Trial, is affirmed.

3. This court adopts pursuant to its supervisory powers as a rule of practice the provisions of Rule 732 of the Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure including subsection (b) relating to the nature and scope of immunity for the reasons expressed in the commentary to the rule.

COMPTON, J., not participating.

State v. Serdahely, 635 P.2d 1182, 1981 Alas. LEXIS 612 (Ala. 1981).

Pincite

635 P.2d 1182 (State v. Serdahely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related