State v. Serafine
This text of 861 So. 2d 522 (State v. Serafine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the State’s appeal of the trial court’s order suppressing evidence consisting of urine test results on the authority of State v. Bodden, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2382, — So.2d — (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.30, 2002), review granted, 853 So.2d 1071 (Fla.2003).1 We recently decided State v. Pierre, 854 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), in which we disagreed with Bodden, reversed the suppression order and certified conflict with Bodden. Following Pierre, we again reverse the appealed order and certify [523]*523conflict with Bodden.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 522, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19261, 2003 WL 22970862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-serafine-fladistctapp-2003.