State v. Sepulveda

353 N.W.2d 790, 120 Wis. 2d 231, 1984 Wisc. LEXIS 2753
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 1984·No. No. 82-1496-CR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

(on motion for reconsideration). The defendant’s motion for reconsideration is denied. The defendant’s motion asserts that the effect of the court’s decision is to incarcerate the defendant in state prison for three years as a condition of probation under sec. 973.09 (4), Stats. We disagree. This case does not stand for the proposition that a trial court may impose incarceration in a state prison for three years as a condition of probation.

By affirming the trial court, this court approved the modification of sentence imposed by the trial judge. As stated in the concurring opinion, the imposition of probation was a nullity upon the impossibility for the condition of probation to be satisfied. The trial court, given the impossibility of fulfillment, was then free to modify its original sentence by imposing a new sentence of three years imprisonment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sepulveda, 353 N.W.2d 790, 120 Wis. 2d 231, 1984 Wisc. LEXIS 2753 (Wis. 1984).

353 N.W.2d 790 (State v. Sepulveda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Michels
441 N.W.2d 278 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1989)