State v. Sepulvado

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Sepulvado

329 So. 2d 193, 1976 La. LEXIS 3883

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 9, 1976·No. No. 57832·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: Joseph Clayton Sepulvado applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Review.

Writ denied: In view of our understanding, based upon the trial judge’s response to the application filed in this court, that he has ordered all subpoenas requested by the defense counsel, and of our further understanding that a hearing on the motion to suppress will be held prior to trial, we consider this assignment of error is moot. The other assigned errors are reviewable in appeal in the event of conviction.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ap- . plication makes no showing to warrant this Court’s review and setting aside of the trial judge’s ruling. It should be denied without qualification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Joseph Clayton Sepulvado applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Review.

Writ denied: In view of our understanding, based upon the trial judge’s response to the application filed in this court, that he has ordered all subpoenas requested by the defense counsel, and of our further understanding that a hearing on the motion to suppress will be held prior to trial, we consider this assignment of error is moot. The other assigned errors are reviewable in appeal in the event of conviction.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ap- . plication makes no showing to warrant this Court’s review and setting aside of the trial judge’s ruling. It should be denied without qualification.

State v. Sepulvado, 329 So. 2d 193, 1976 La. LEXIS 3883 (La. 1976).

Pincite

329 So. 2d 193 (State v. Sepulvado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related