State v. Seno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Seno

257 A.2d 46, 158 Conn. 646

DecidedSeptember 24, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.2d 46 (State v. Seno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Seno, 257 A.2d 46, 158 Conn. 646 (Colo. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendant for a writ of coram nobis is dismissed.

The motion by the defendant for an order to show cause is dismissed.

Patrick Seno, pro se, on the petition and on the motion. David B. Salzman, assistant state’s attorney, on the motion. Submitted September 15

decided September 24, 1969

Submitted September 9 decided September 24, 1969

The motion by the state for an order requiring or appointing counsel for the defendant is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendant for a writ of coram nobis is dismissed.

The motion by the defendant for an order to show cause is dismissed.

Patrick Seno, pro se, on the petition and on the motion. David B. Salzman, assistant state’s attorney, on the motion. Submitted September 15

decided September 24, 1969

Submitted September 9 decided September 24, 1969

The motion by the state for an order requiring or appointing counsel for the defendant is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.2d 46, 158 Conn. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-seno-conn-1969.