State v. Seno

257 A.2d 46, 158 Conn. 646

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 24, 1969·Published

Opinion

The petition by the defendant for a writ of coram nobis is dismissed.

The motion by the defendant for an order to show cause is dismissed.

Patrick Seno, pro se, on the petition and on the motion. David B. Salzman, assistant state’s attorney, on the motion. Submitted September 15

decided September 24, 1969

Submitted September 9 decided September 24, 1969

The motion by the state for an order requiring or appointing counsel for the defendant is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendant for a writ of coram nobis is dismissed.

The motion by the defendant for an order to show cause is dismissed.

Patrick Seno, pro se, on the petition and on the motion. David B. Salzman, assistant state’s attorney, on the motion. Submitted September 15

decided September 24, 1969

Submitted September 9 decided September 24, 1969

The motion by the state for an order requiring or appointing counsel for the defendant is dismissed.

State v. Seno, 257 A.2d 46, 158 Conn. 646 (Colo. 1969).

Pincite

257 A.2d 46 (State v. Seno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.