State v. Senhouse

271 A.D.2d 523, 706 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Roger Senhouse appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated March 29, 1999, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered April 28, 1995, upon his failure to appear or answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not establish both a reasonable excuse for his default and the existence of a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion to vacate his default (see, Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v Walker, 255 AD2d 381; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568; Orlando v Corning Inc., 213 AD2d 464; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Senhouse, 271 A.D.2d 523, 706 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 523 (State v. Senhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putney v. Pearlman
203 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Orlando v. Corning Inc.
213 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis
238 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Walker
255 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)