State v. Seljan

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Seljan

895 N.E.2d 183, 119 Ohio St. 3d 485

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 2008·No. No. 2008-1085·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. IV.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, 2008-Ohio-1625, 886 N.E.2d 181.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. IV.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, 2008-Ohio-1625, 886 N.E.2d 181.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State v. Seljan, 895 N.E.2d 183, 119 Ohio St. 3d 485 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

895 N.E.2d 183 (State v. Seljan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related